Recite Help: In-text Issues

Introduction

There are two types of in-text issues:

  1. Those that are a mismatch between your citation and your reference list (in red) Screenshot showing example of mismatch error (red)
  2. and style warnings (in orange) Screenshot showing example of style issue (orange) These style warnings can be toggled on/off via the "Show style warnings" option at the top of the list Screenshot showing in-text filters, highlighting show style warnings

A full run-down of the various features within our user interface is available in our user interface guide.

Mismatches (in red)

There are lots of different issues that Recite highlights, related to a mismatch between your in-text citation and its corresponding entry (or lack of) in your reference list.

Tip: Use the find/search feature in your browser to quickly find a particular message on this page.

Problem:

Check: No references for author(s) or year (1976)

Screenshot showing no reference match for this author or year

Explanation:

  • A reference for the specified author(s) or year wasn't found in your reference list.
  • Similarly spelt authors were also checked, with nothing found.
  • This is therefore likely to be a missing reference list entry, or as in the example above, a year mentioned in text which doesn't need citing.

Applies to:

  • All

Problem:

Check: No references for year (2001) match these author(s)

Screenshot showing no reference match for this year

Explanation:

  • There are references for this year but none of them matched these authors.
  • Similarly spelt authors were also checked, with nothing found.
  • This is likely to be a missing reference list entry.
  • It's worth highlighting that our example here illustrates an important feature: Recite won't display warnings (in this case a missing comma after "Wallace") unless it can find an exact match for the citation.

Applies to:

  • All

Problem:

Author mismatch:

Screenshot showing author mismatch

Explanation:

  • Missing author (eg. only 3 authors mentioned, when there are 4) OR
  • Misspelled author (typo in one or the other meaning they don't match) OR
  • Misspelled by difference in an accented character (diacritic) (Duperre vs. Duperré) OR
  • An acronym (for a group author) appears to be used before it's defined in text (and therefore can't be a match) OR
  • A title used in place of authors, then abbreviated in the citation (for APA this is OK, but Recite points it out as it's a non-exact match).

Applies to:

  • All

Problem:

Author mismatch (Is xxxx an author?)

Explanation:

  • Recite found what looks like an author before the first author match, so maybe a missed author (from reference).
  • We've automatically skipped common conjunctive adverbs to prevent false positives for things like (Similarly, Beale & Jones, 2020).

Applies to:

  • All

Problem:

Warning: Is this an "et al."? Year and one author match to:

Screenshot showing possible missing or incorrectly formatted et al.

Explanation:

  • Single author and year in citation, which doesn't exactly match a reference list entry.
  • An entry was found that had 3+ authors, with the same lead author and year, so it would match if it were an "et al."
  • Likely that this was meant to be an et al.
  • This is also triggered when the author uses "... and colleagues" or similar et al. alternative.
  • Note: The above example refers to multiple citations, so they are numbered for ease of readability. We can therefore see that our error relates the second year (2).

Applies to:

  • All

Problem:

Year mismatch:

Screenshot showing year mismatch

Explanation:

  • Year doesn't agree between citation and reference list (typo or possibly missed reference).
  • Suggestion(s) show possible matches.

Applies to:

  • All

Further reading:

  • APA 7th Edition Manual: pp. 261-278 (sections 8.10–8.36)
  • Example: Dates in a citation [APA Style].
  • APA 6th Edition Manual: pp. 174-180 (sections 6.11–6.21)

Problem:

Year match only:

Screenshot showing reference matched by year only

Explanation:

  • There is a single entry in your reference list for this year, but not for the same or similar authors.
  • Probably missing a reference list entry.
  • The suggestion(s) are unlikely to be a match, unless there's a major typo.

Applies to:

  • All

Problem:

Year and author mismatch:

Screenshot showing year and author mismatch

Explanation:

  • Found a match where the author(s) partially match, but the year doesn't.
  • The incorrect author, or in this case the missing author, is highlighted in red.

Applies to:

  • All

Problem:

Original year mismatch

Explanation:

  • Original works (2014/2018) type citations (republished/reprinted works).
  • For works with dual dates in the citation, the reference list entry should have a single date for the year, but contain a note referring to the original work.
  • Generally, with this warning, Recite has detected that the reference list contains no mention of the original date (therefore it can't be an exact match).

Applies to:

  • APA 6th Edition
  • APA 7th Edition

Further reading:

Problem:

Ambiguous et al. See correct usage here.

Screenshot showing ambiguous et al. usage

Explanation:

  • Et al. used which could refer to multiple entries in reference list - disambiguate with additional authors, (eg. Smith, Jones, et al.).

Applies to:

  • APA 6th Edition
  • APA 7th Edition

Further reading:

Problem:

Ambiguous due to duplicate entry in reference list.

Explanation:

  • Citation exactly matches more than one reference list entry, but Recite has detected that this is due to a duplicate entry in the reference list.
  • Recite will also highlight the duplicate entries in the reference list.
  • Removing the duplicate should fix this issue.

Applies to:

  • All

Problem:

Ambiguous (use 2013a style to differentiate). More than one exact match found for the next reference!

Screenshot showing ambiguous citation where suffix style is necessary

Explanation:

  • More than one exact match for author(s) and year, so needs disambiguating (using 2013a style).
  • This warning only appears for "reference twins" - all authors and year must match.
  • Could point to a near-duplicate reference in the reference list.

Applies to:

  • APA 6th Edition
  • APA 7th Edition

Further reading:

Problem:

Ambiguous (use correct author initials before surname to differentiate). More than one exact match found for the next reference!

Screenshot showing ambiguous citation where initials should be used to disambiguate

Explanation:

  • This author and year combination matches multiple entries in the reference list.
  • Disambiguate with author initials (within the citation).

Applies to:

  • APA 6th Edition
  • APA 7th Edition

Further reading:

Problem:

Multiple Matches - check. More than one exact match found for the next reference!

Screenshot showing ambiguous citation resulting in multiple matches message

Explanation:

  • More than one item in the reference list, is an exact match for this citation - needs disambiguating.

Applies to:

  • All

Further reading:

Problem:

Invalid "et al." (not enough authors: only 2 found) Year and author(s) match:

Screenshot showing et al. issue - too few authors found

Explanation:

  • Found a match for the lead author and year, but can't be the actual match, as it's not valid as an et al. (too few authors).
  • OR (as in the screenshot above) we've found a match with the authors specified, but there aren't enough remaining authors to satisfy the requirement that "et al." is plural. For example, if you specify 3 authors et al., then the reference it relates to would need 5+ as "et al." means "and others" (plural).

Applies to:

  • All

Further reading:

Problem:

Looks like a page with no corresponding year: Double check this

Screenshot showing citation with a page number but no obvious year

Explanation:

  • Found a page number in parentheses, but the sentence doesn't seem to contain a year to help match it up - therefore needs checking.

Applies to:

  • All

Problem:

Looks like a secondary source: Double check this

Explanation:

  • Citation is something like (2009, as cited in Bond et al., 2017) [for APA].
  • This is sometimes accompanied by an additional style warning, indicating a formatting issue (missing comma etc.).
  • Where an additional style warning isn't shown the "looks like a secondary source" warning is just to double check that you actually wanted to use a secondary source here.

Applies to:

  • All

Further reading:

Problem:

Check: Personal communications should not be included in your reference list

Screenshot showing a personal communication citation which is incorrectly included in the reference list

Explanation:

  • Citation says it's a personal communication but a corresponding reference has been found in the reference list.
  • Personal communications (as they aren't a retrievable source) shouldn't appear in the reference list, so should be removed.

Applies to:

  • All

Further reading:

Style warnings (in orange)

Problem:

Style warning: Multiple citations should be in correct alphabetical order (as reference list)

Screenshot showing multiple citations in the same parentheses, incorrectly ordered

Explanation:

  • When you have multiple citations within the same parentheses, the citations should be ordered alphabetically (by the same rules as the reference list).

Applies to:

  • APA 6th Edition
  • APA 7th Edition

Further reading:

Problem:

Style warning: Contracted (Author et al., 2012, 2013) citations should be in chronological order

Explanation:

  • When you have multiple citations within the same parentheses, by the same displayed authors, you mention the author names once then the years in chronological order.
  • In the case of an "et al.", where the "et al." actually relates to different authors, this rule still applies (hence "displayed authors" in the above).

Applies to:

  • APA 6th Edition
  • APA 7th Edition

Further reading:

Problem:

Style warning: Use ampersand (" & ") (and no extra characters) to separate last 2 authors

Screenshot showing last two authors missing ampersand between them

Explanation:

  • The last two authors in a parenthetical citation should be separated by an ampersand (&) character (with a space either side).
  • In the example above, Recite additionally says "(and no extra characters)", as this example has only 2 authors. For 3+ authors that additional message is omitted.

Applies to:

  • APA 6th Edition
  • APA 7th Edition

Further reading:

Problem:

Style warning: Use "et al." when citing this reference

Screenshot showing citation where 'et al.' should be used

Explanation:

  • Where a reference has 3 or more authors, use the lead authors surname and "et al.".
  • It may be necessary to include more than one author surname before the "et al.", if using "et al." makes the citation ambiguous.
  • For APA 6th Edition, the first citation (for 3+ authors) should include the authors in full, then subsequent citations should use "et al.".
  • For APA 7th Edition, "et al." is used for all citations (with 3+ authors).

Applies to:

  • APA 6th Edition: after first use (for 3+ authors)
  • APA 7th Edition: each use for 3+ authors

Further reading:

Problem:

Style warning: "et al." use incorrect unless all authors cited previously

Screenshot showing citation where 'et al.' has been used incorrectly

Explanation:

  • For APA 6th Edition, the first citation (for 3+ authors) should include the authors in full, then subsequent citations should use "et al.".

Applies to:

  • APA 6th Edition

Further reading:

Problem:

Style warning: For valid APA, use "et al."

Screenshot showing citation where 'et al.' format is incorrect

Explanation:

  • Typo with "et al." (probably missed trailing dot, or included one on et).

Applies to:

  • APA 6th Edition
  • APA 7th Edition

Further reading:

Problem:

Style warning: Multiple citations should be separated by a semi-colon (and a space)

Screenshot showing multiple citations incorrectly separated (should be semi-colon)

Explanation:

  • When you have multiple citations in the same parenthetical, they should be separated by a semi-colon, followed by a space.

Applies to:

  • APA 6th Edition
  • APA 7th Edition

Further reading:

Problem:

Style warning: Year should be preceded by a comma and space (eg. author, year)

Screenshot showing a citation where the formatting between the author and year is incorrect

Explanation:

  • Within a parenthetical citation, where you have one of more authors, followed by a year, ensure you have a comma (and space) after the authors, before the year.

Applies to:

  • APA 6th Edition
  • APA 7th Edition

Further reading:

Problem:

Style warning: In a narrative citation, use " and " to separate last 2 authors

Explanation:

  • For citations NOT in parentheses (narrative citation), APA rules say to use "and" not ampersand.

Applies to:

  • APA 6th Edition
  • APA 7th Edition

Further reading:

Problem:

Style warning: Multiple citations with the same (displayed) author(s) should use (Author, 2012, 2013) style

Screenshot showing multiple citations with the same displayed author, which should be contracted

Explanation:

  • When you have multiple citations within the same parentheses, by the same displayed authors, contract to (Author, 2012, 2013), rather than repeating author(s).
  • This rule even applies in the case of "et al." citations, where the expanded "et al." refer to different authors.

Applies to:

  • APA 6th Edition
  • APA 7th Edition

Further reading:

Problem:

Style warning: APA uses "p." or "pp." notation for page numbers

Screenshot showing a citation with incorrect page numbering for APA

Explanation:

  • Recite has detected some page numbers, but they don't appear to formatted correctly. APA uses "p." or "pp." notation for page numbers.

Applies to:

  • APA 6th Edition
  • APA 7th Edition

Further reading:

Problem:

Style warning: Did you mean to use a secondary source? (hint: use "as cited in")

Explanation:

  • Recite has detected a citation that looks like a secondary source (Jones, 2010, as cited in Smith et al., 2020), but the formatting looks incorrect.
  • Use "as cited in" (as above), which is the correct APA format for secondary sources.

Applies to:

  • APA 6th Edition
  • APA 7th Edition

Further reading:

Problem:

Style warning: ibid. notation is not valid APA

Explanation:

  • An abbreviation of the Latin word ibidem, Ibid literally means "in the same place".
  • Some reference styles use "ibid." notation, to mean a citation is exactly the same as the one that precedes it.
  • APA does not use this notation.

Applies to:

  • APA 6th Edition
  • APA 7th Edition

Problem:

Style warning: For 3+ authors, all author names should be followed by a comma and space (including before the ampersand)

Screenshot showing a citation with 3+ authors, where a comma is missing in separating them

Explanation:

  • In APA style, author names in a parenthetical citation, should all have a comma (,) after them.
  • This includes the one before the ampersand (&) - (Smith, Jones, & Davis, 2010).

Applies to:

  • APA 6th Edition
  • APA 7th Edition

Further reading:

Problem:

Style warning: Did you mean to reference the previous author(s) again, but for [year]? (hint: separate with a comma)

Screenshot showing multiple citations for the same author where a comma should be used to separate years

Explanation:

  • You appear to be citing the same authors again, for a different year, but the syntax looks incorrect.
  • Use (Smith, 2012, 2013).

Applies to:

  • APA 6th Edition
  • APA 7th Edition

Further reading:

Problem:

Style warning: Did you mean to reference the previous author(s) again, but for [year]? (hint: separate with a semi-colon)

Explanation:

  • You appear to be citing the same authors again, for a different year, but the syntax looks incorrect.
  • This is very similar to the APA example above, but Harvard generally uses a semi-colon instead of a comma.
  • Most Harvard styles would use (Smith, 2012; 2013).

Applies to:

  • Harvard

Problem:

Style warning: Author and "et al." should be separated by a space only (no comma or other character needed)

Screenshot showing a single author et al with an extra comma after the author

Explanation:

  • For valid APA, the format for a single author et al. should be (Smith et al., 2012).
  • Generally, this issue is triggered for an extra comma after the author name.

Applies to:

  • APA 6th Edition
  • APA 7th Edition

Further reading:

Problem:

Style warning: Possible Ambiguity - when more than one reference has the same lead author surname, use correct author initials before surname to avoid confusion. Ensure reference entries are correct before adjusting.

Screenshot showing a citation which matches a reference list entry where the first author could be ambiguous

Explanation:

  • Where you have more than one reference entry where the lead author shares the same surname (and different initials), APA rules state you should use the author's initials before the surname in all citations, to avoid confusion.
  • This applies even if the references have different additional authors and/or have different years.
  • Use initials before the author's surname to assist the reader, for example the above should be (e.g. G. Brown & Harris, 1978; Hare, 1956)
  • As the warning states - it's important that you double check that your reference list is accurate before amending the citation. You may have more than one reference that actually has the same leading author, but you've been inconsistent with their initials, such that they appear to be different. Don't change an author's initials just to make them consistent though - it's more important they are correct.

Applies to:

  • APA 6th Edition
  • APA 7th Edition

Further reading: